Announcements
keno

Porn and sex pictures

Status: In Review
by keno on ‎11-14-2011 07:49 AM

I think tagged should have some kind approval process for Pictures....Maybe review the uploads and take 24 hours before they can be posted...The pictures and video Pictures are getting more Frequent and more sexual..There are 16 year old kids allowed on this site and adults who don't care to see them...I shouldn't have to lock my door to log onto tagged to shield my family from PORN ....When a sexual or porn Picture is reported that account should be deleted not just the picture taken away....if there are so many people who want those kind of pictures please make a adult only sexual tagged 

Comments
by Question Master on ‎11-23-2011 02:01 PM

Hi Keno.

I posted similar to this a short time ago in the community forums.

My idea was to adopt the photo approval system used by many dating sites.  It would stop the ever increasing use of porn photos in pet runs as well.

by Zodiac on ‎12-09-2011 04:59 AM

please make us retreav accounts by e-mail or mobile, not only mobile!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by ashley1995h on ‎12-20-2011 07:33 AM

I've heard about software that can recognize features in photos / videos.  Seems as if that COULD be used to "prescreen" pics before being posted.  Then if the program "hits" on something, a live person could / should review it.

 

@keno, Tagged is rather quick to delete accounts as it is.  It would be better for a "three strikes" rule, as LONG AS the user that is at risk of losing their account is told WHY their account is being considered for deletion.

by deluxequill on ‎12-22-2011 07:56 AM

I agree with Ashlee1995h......the three strikes and ur out option seems more reasonable. I'm hoping once the person knows that the Taggged team is onto them he/she might dessist entirely. If not.....well boots them out!!

by travlinman on ‎12-23-2011 08:10 AM

My account was hacked not long ago and porn photos where sent.It was not me but my account was deleted right away and took me some time to get it back...That was not fair for me..3 strikes with a chance to defend works well for me.

by keno on ‎12-24-2011 02:06 PM

3 strikes your out would only make for more porn photos....then they would know they could use the sexual photos 2 times to their advantage before at a risk to lose account....most of the people using porn photos are not regular players ....its people creating new accounts and using the porn photos to go higher in value once the run is over they change to a normal photo.....this is why i suggest the photos need to be reviewed before being used...im here to play pets and as it is now i have to make sure my door is closed and no one is around to go to the browse tab and search pets...

by palmbayman on ‎01-06-2012 10:01 PM

Ok i am going to say this once all the people under 18 should not be on here in the first place this site is for people 18+ thats why when i see a person on here that has there age set as 18 and say that there 16 or 17 that person gets reported tagged needs to go through the accounts and remove all the underage users that should not be on here they might say that there over 18 just look at there about me and there true age is on there

 

And yes i agree tagged should have adult section of the website and it should be free so the peole who is not looking for that don't have to worry and all the people taht are looking for it will be there but also make it harder to join because underage kids will be joing that site to

 

BOOT THEM AND WE WILL NOT HAVE THIS PROBLEM!!!!!!!!!!!

by maiu on ‎01-12-2012 07:13 AM

hello dear tagged i sugest to ask allways for picture n absolutlely allways what kind of relation or marital status your comminity are so is easear n we loose less time to search our contacts  pls  pay attention to this ask it makes easy our search  i m tagged friend 4 ever n i love u

by maiu on ‎01-12-2012 07:15 AM

please give ,me back my old tagged my name is maiu m  n i cant acsses it help me please i never broke your rules n i loVO TAGGED  MAIU M

by maiu on ‎01-12-2012 07:16 AM

NO PORN OR PERVERTED PEOPLE2""""""""!!!!!!!!!!!!!!MAIU M

by palmbayman on ‎01-13-2012 11:28 PM

Ok i am going to say this once again all the people under 18 should not be on here in the first place this site is for people 18+ thats why when i see a person on here that has there age set as 18 and say that there 16 or 17 that person gets reported tagged needs to go through the accounts and remove all the underage users that should not be on here they might say that there over 18 just look at there about me and there true age is on there

 

And yes i agree tagged should have adult section of the website and it should be free so the peole who is not looking for that don't have to worry and all the people taht are looking for it will be there but also make it harder to join because underage kids will be joing that site to

 

BOOT THEM AND WE WILL NOT HAVE THIS PROBLEM!!!!!!!!!!!

by Super Sorter Aanta on ‎02-12-2012 02:23 AM
@palmbayman: Now you made that claim that you posted twice as well. so hardly anything you said 'once'. That still make it true or correct in any which way. Please understand that Tagged is NOT one adult site! It were in fact originally created for teenagers, but so many adults jumped on that they cater for both age groups nowadays. So there will be no 'booting' of anyone but those who cannot behave.
by little-bit on ‎02-17-2012 04:49 AM

I am an adult! I don't want to see that crap on here. I have come acrossed porn pics twice in 2 weeks. I will stand up and say, I reported it and I will keep on reporting it. If you want to show or see porn, then go to their sites. Teen agers can get on Tagged, we as parents should be monitoring this sited. Please keep porn off this site.

by devarajan_sk on ‎02-17-2012 05:22 AM

.. I have just encountered a problem....When i click BROWSE PETS as well as BUY PETS...the site is not  responding...i.e., i am not getting any pet details for me to decide....it is just blank....please rectify the error at the earliest........................

by 1966 on ‎02-29-2012 06:49 PM

helloo....

 

I have my pict in my profile for months, many months, why only now you deleted , isnt nuduty or porn, i am  a pet player is only a sensual one, after that i put another one, maybe for a month, no nude no porn, and after a month you deleted again, a put another and tonight  you deleted again...

Can you explain to me why???? many months passed an only now you deleted a pict, witouth porn or nudity, whats a matter with my pics???????

 

please answer me soon as posssible

thanks

by palmbayman on ‎03-10-2012 06:45 PM

@Aanta: If tagged was created for teens why do you have to be 18 to join?

And why when search for people its 18 to 99 not 13 or 16 to 99?

 

I hate looking for people and find someone who says they are 20 or 21 and then I go and look at there profile and find out they are 16 or 17 what I am saying is yes when someone has to lie about there age just to join a site then they should be booted for giving out false information because people can get into trouble for saying the wrong thing to them and that's not right

 

And about porn on this site I am not saying to turn it into an all adult site I said make a separate site for people who is looking for that kind of stuff so every body can be happy and just because someone likes adult material does not make them wrong or perverts I am getting tired of all the bigots on this site bashing people who they think are wrong yall need to take a good look in the mirror people are not perfect yall have just as many flaws as the next person 

 

Thank you and have a great day d:smileyhappy:



 

 

 

by keno on ‎03-19-2012 07:57 AM

@ palmbayman.....you only have to be 13 to join tagged....the reason you as an adult see 18 to 99 is because tagged protects them from being searched by adults.....under 18 you need to know them before you can even contact them.....tagged is not a 18+ only sight ....it never has been read the Terms Of Service

 

Please read the following important Terms of Service Agreement (the "Agreement") before accessing or using any of the various services (the "Services") made available to you (the "Member") by Tagged, Inc. ("Tagged") through http://www.tagged.com, Tagged mobile applications or otherwise. ONLY USERS WHO ARE 13 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER MAY REGISTER FOR TAGGED. By completing the registration process for the Tagged website, you represent that you are 13 years of age or older, and can and will be legally bound by this Agreement. If you are a minor, your parent or guardian must read and accept the terms of this Agreement before you register. No Member may participate where doing so would be prohibited by any applicable law or regulation.

by Kittynip on ‎05-05-2012 11:31 PM

It is a mute argument about their being kids on the sight because this is an adult sight. So, there should not be anyone on here that is under the age of 18.

 

If they are saying they are 18 and are actually younger, those kids should be monitored by their parents. So, that is a parents issue and not taggeds. After all, if a kid is on the web for porn, there are lot easier ways to look at porn as we all know.

 

My issue is more about tagged deleting pictures and accusing people of such pictures when they are not porn. There is no nudity. The person is dress appropriately to be out in public view. And, worst, fully dress but are too good looking for the tagged monitors. That is completely wrong in every sense of the word.

 

Even worse is when the picture is from the shoulders, or neck up and they are getting deleted. There is no excuse for that, and people on tagged should not be felt ostersized for being good looking or a picture that is not showing any nudity. Defiantly not for a head shot.

 

I have seen things like this in the past where something as innocent as a sculpture of a squirrel is looked as being bad, because some one with a guilty and perverted mind wants to say that only shows someone is squirreling around.

 

There needs to be a more standard quality assurance to only address pornographer. And, not based on how someone may feel about the picture. Objectivity, over subjectivity.

 

When reading up on tagged and its history, I see that it has been sued many times and have lost many times. I think for their method of gauging such pictures need to be more standardized and objective so that it does not open the door for someone decide to take tagged to court on the bases of discrimination.

 

After all if a picture is not pornographic if it clearly not showing a person's genitals, it is not porn. And, when a person is fully clothed or showing only the neck up, that is clearly not pornographic.

 

I also think its wrong to ban pictures of two girls kissing. Kissing should not be considered to be too sexual. If a person does not like such pictures, they can just ask the sender to not send such pictures. Or, can simple delete that person from their friends list. Other wise kissing with a man and woman should be banned as well. Other wise that is sexual discrimination of sexes. And, since G rated shows are allowed to show people kissing, that is clearly not pornographic.

 

The bottom line is that I am getting tired of Tagged using poor judgement on deleting pictures and people who are not violating tagged rules just because they feel they can does not make it right. I would imagine Tagged is against discrimination, and if that is the case they should not discriminate them self. the very least recognized there are laws against discrimination, and realize its bad business to discriminate against their clients.

 

 

 

Some may argue that since many dont pay to be on the sight they are not clients. That would be a mute point since Tagged is profiting from those people most of all for all the millions if not billions of dollars the company is making.

 

If a person does not like such pics, do what I do. If I dont like a picture or what someone said's to me, all I have to do is delete them from my friends list and the problem is solved. That is easier than reporting a person. Which I think most of the adults on here already know.

 

When a person clearly violates the rules I can fully understand. I am just tired of seeing all the innocent people getting in trouble when they clearly have not done anything wrong.

by Kittynip on ‎05-05-2012 11:35 PM

keno,

 

That would be another example of tagged not being consistant with what they are saying. Because it does also clearly state that this is an adult sight. Clearly 13 is not an adult. So, it's own policy is in conflict and contradicting it self.

by Kittynip on ‎05-09-2012 11:22 AM

It seems that after I have posted my statements here, that tagged is now going out of their way to bust me for for my comments. Each day I have gotten a pop up saying I am trying to post banned material. Over the past of couple days, one was from the shoulders up a comment with a pretty women putting her lipstick on, the other was a girl riding in the car sticking her tongue out. And a third, was a short video of a cat going in and out of a box.

 

Come on Tagged clearly neither is porn. For it to be porn, the person needs to show nudity, and for you to see them actually doing something sexual with their privet body parts. Both pictures were PG rated easily.

 

Now through my art background I have seen extreme religious people trying to symbolically try to twist things as being sexual in some far out stretch of the imagination. Though the trough of the matter is through Art Physiology, that is more a reflection of the person trying to interpreter such symbolism rather than the picture, or art medium or the artiest who did the picture.

 

Yes this may be a business, and business like to think they can do what they want to, but there are still laws for isolating, singling someone out, and discrimination. There are also fair business laws to treat all customers fairly and equally.

 

I am guessing since I am having more difficulties now, that this letter may only make things worse. All I am trying to do is speak reason with tagged.

by Kittynip on ‎05-09-2012 12:12 PM

Well that did not take long. I am already being blocked for sending banned material. Fully cloths women, blowing a kiss, and the banner hugs under them. There is nothing sexual in how they are dressed, No cleavage, no legs are showing, no large chest women. Some wearing sun hats. All dressed very conservatively.

 

The only material I have posted that I could possible imagine today that tagged would be banning me, would be my post in this room. The is the only thing someone may deem controversial.

by keno on ‎06-13-2012 09:37 PM

@ Kittynip sorry your having issues with Pictures .... My issue has always been about Porn Pics (genitals showing) and not in comments those are easy to delete..... im talking as MainProfile Pics..... as for your trying to post banned material issue ..... i have had that message sending messages with no pics in it ... i think its something in the HTML ... like if i copy and paste a paragraph from another site and send it in a message sometimes it wont let me send .... but if i hand type the same message it lets it go thru .... so it might not be the pic at all but where you got the Pic from ....I would like to think we can let our Thoughts and feelings know in this forum with out being targeted afterwards for doing so :smileysad:

by Dewey Decimal caughtyaeye on ‎08-21-2012 12:15 AM

I posted a similar request. My photo wasn't showing any nudity, but got reported and deleted. It would be better if pics were reviewed first by Tagged, then permitted to post. Problem with the whole idea is, they may not have the staff to do this. 

by SonuEscort on ‎10-21-2012 11:53 AM

Sonu Escort service--9818412066 South delhi 1500shot

I m Sonu from delhi available to provide my company to the decent people who don't have problem to pay my time.

in any one interested then reply or contact me to talk.

 

Regards

Sonu

9818412066

by jeasuspeacus on ‎01-03-2013 09:38 PM

so i gues im the only one who was looking for porn on here eh?..

by riversidecowboy on ‎05-03-2013 11:04 AM

If tagged took the nessecery steps to do a back search and an approval to the photos being uploaded and keep track of the ones hubitualy submiting fake or term violating photos it would ELIMINATE 2 problem (1) SCAMMER profiles would decrees drasticly (2) the porn issue would be ELIMINATED . the site would be a much safer place to play and meet REAL people and not be constintly worried about getting sucked into a scam or your computer being destroyed like mine was last month because i was doing what TAGGED should have been doing ALL along WE should not have to be open TARGETS to INTERNATIONAL SCAMMERS and CRIMANALS we should be able to be on this site and be SAFE . Come on TAGGED I reported and personaly busted well over 500 profiles in the last 3 monthes and that is the truth i have compiled a list and documented all of them TIME to get SERIOUSE about these SCUMBAG CRIMINALS